Will “Go Fast, Go Hard” On Offense Put an Added Strain on BYU’s Defense?


The mantra heard throughout this offseason has been “Go Fast, Go Hard”.  This is in reference to the offensive tempo as well as the offensive mindset that Robert Anae intends to make the trademark of the BYU offense.

Last season, at times, BYU went fast with their periodic employment of the Nitro offense where Riley Nelson would pick and choose moments to accelerate the pace of the offense and get the next snap off as quickly as possible.  Despite the difficulty in several games to put points on the board, BYU still managed to be successful at winning the time of possession battle (19th nationally at 31:57 per game).  As a result, BYU ran 77 plays per game on offense, which was 5.5 plays per game more than the NCAA average.

In part because BYU was able to win the time of possession and in even larger part because BYU had the 3rd ranked defense in 2012, BYU’s opponents only ran 59.9 plays per game, the fewest in the nation.

As part of Go Fast, Go Hard, Anae has mentioned trying to run as many as 90 plays per game on offense.  Only the 2012 Marshall team has averaged 90 plays per game for an entire season, so this is a lofty goal.  Bronco is mindful of the impact this could have on his defense, mentioning several times that he expects his defense to have to be on the field for an additional 15 to 20 plays a game, due to the increased tempo on offense.

Is this an accurate expectation?  The analysis below will show that may not necessarily be the case.

Image

The scatterplot chart above plots the season average number of offensive plays per game versus the average number of defensive plays per game, both relative to the NCAA average for that season.  The reason for this chart is to visually determine if more plays on offense necessarily results in more plays on defense.

The chart boils down over 1,400 individual data points into a trendline.  If Bronco’s premise is correct, the trendline would be expected to have nearly a 45 degree slope, or in other words, for every additional play on offense, there would a corresponding additional play on defense.  However, the data do not show such a relationship; with the trendline just barely greater than horizontal.

But does this relationship change for the handful of teams that REALLY push the pace?

Image

Since 2001, only 33 teams have averaged at least 80 offensive plays a game for an entire season.  The scatterplot shows that for teams which really push the pace, it does often result in their opponents also running more plays per game than the NCAA average.  Of the 33 teams that ran over 80 plays per game, 10 of them had opponents that failed to run their normal average number of plays per game and 23 of them exceeded their season’s average.   Overall, these 33 teams’ collective opponents ran 3.16 plays more than they averaged for that season; far from the 15 to 20 plays that Bronco has been preparing for.

The 2012 Arizona opponents ran 12.3 plays against the Arizona D more than they did overall, the largest increase of the 33 teams.  It’s also worth noting that the 2012 Arizona defense was ranked 118th in the nation, so the large increase in their number of plays can’t be blamed entirely on their offensive tempo.

The expectation is that the 2013 BYU defense will more closely resemble the 2012 BYU defense than it will the 2012 Arizona defense, so should we really expect to see the Cougar D on the field as much as Bronco fears?  Based on the analysis above, even if BYU can up their offensive output from 77 to between 85 and 90 plays, it would appear the defense will be playing closer to between 5 to 10 extra plays than it will be 15 to 20.

1 Comment

Filed under Football

Your CougarStats 2000s All-Decade football team


The voting is over and the readers have spoken. Listed below is the CougarStats All-decade BYU football team for 2000-2009:

QB: John Beck

RB: Luke Staley, Harvey Unga

TE: Dennis Pitta

WR: Austin Collie, Reno Mahe

OL: Ben Archibald, Travis Bright, Ray Feinga, Scott Jackson, Matt Reynolds

DL: Brett Keisel, Jan Jorgensen, Chris Hoke, Ryan Denney

LB: Bryan Kehl, Cameron Jensen, Brady Poppinga

DB: Aaron Francisco, Andrew Rich, Brian Logan, Jernaro Gilford

K: Matt Payne

P: Matt Payne

RS: Austin Collie

Leave a comment

Filed under Football

CougarStats 2000s all-decade team: Special Teams


Last week’s voting for all-decade linebackers was a clear-cut choice for Aaron Francisco, Andrew Rich, Brian Logan and Jernaro Gilford. All of the other candidates only had single-digit vote counts.

This week, the final week of the survey, we have three polls, please vote in all of them. Kickers, punters and return specialists. Vote for whomever you like, but keep a few things in mind.

Kickers – Owen Pochman’s 2000 season should be the only one considered. 97-99 were in the previous decade.

Punters – Riley Stephenson’s 2009 season should be the only one considered for the same reason.

Return Specialists – Only vote based on Austin Collie’s kickoff and punt return abilities. Not his overall pass catching awesomeness.

The nominees are for 2000s all-decade team return specialists are O’Neil ChambersAustin CollieBryce Mahuika and Nathan Meikle.

So, the nominees are for 2000s all-decade team kickers are Jared McLaughlin, Matt Payne, Mitch Payne and Owen Pochman.

The nominees are for 2000s all-decade team punters are Aaron Edmonds, Derek McLaughlin, Matt Payne, CJ Santiago and Riley Stephenson.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Football

CougarStats All-Decade Team: Defensive Backs


After a long delay, we’re ready to finish up our CougarStats 2000s All-Decade defense. Vote for FOUR defensive backs. The nominees are Aaron Francisco, Jernaro Gilford, Quinn Gooch, Brandon Heaney, Jared Lee, Brian Logan, Levi Madarieta, Andrew Rich and David Tafuna.

2 Comments

Filed under Football

CougarStats 2000s all-decade team: Linebackers


You selected the 2000-2009 all-decade defensive line last week. The winners were Brett Keisel, Jan Jorgensen, Chris Hoke and Ryan Denney. Now we turn to the linebackers. The nominees are Matt Bauman, Coleby Clawson, Justin Ena, Cameron Jensen, Bryan Kehl, Isaac Kelley, David Nixon, Brady Poppinga, Kelly Poppinga and Paul Walkenhorst.

Vote for three. The poll will remain open for the rest of the week.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

CougarStats 2000s all-decade team: Defensive Line


After taking a three-week hiatus, we are back to vote on the CougarStats 2000-2009 all-decade defense. We’ll start this week with the defensive line. The nominees are Manaia Brown, Ryan Denney, Setema Gali, Chris Hoke, Jan Jorgensen, Brett Keisel, Shaun Nua and Hans Olsen.

Vote for four. The poll will stay up for the rest of the week.

Leave a comment

Filed under Football

Your CougarStats 2000s All-Decade Offense


The voting is complete for the CougarStats 2000s all-decade team on the offensive side of the ball. We’ll move on to defense starting next week.

QB: John Beck

RB: Luke Staley, Harvey Unga

TE: Dennis Pitta

WR: Austin Collie, Reno Mahe

OL: Ben Archibald, Travis Bright, Ray Feinga, Scott Jackson, Matt Reynolds

Leave a comment

Filed under Football

BYU’s Long-Distance Shooting: Sinking to New Lows


A week ago, https://blog.cougarstats.com/2012/01/30/the-terrible-tale-of-the-threes/ was posted, using a little mathematical thought exercise about how unlikely BYU’s 4 game shooting slump from three point range was.  Times have changed, but BYU’s shooting woes haven’t.  Over their last  6 games, BYU has only hit 17 of their last 101 three point attempts.  A mere 16.8%.

Let me introduce you to the Grambling State Tigers.  Grambling State has a wonderful football legacy; Eddie Robinson had over 400 career wins, placed dozens of players in the NFL and they get a national appearance on NBC every Thanksgiving weekend.  However, their basketball program is another story.

Grambling is the worst shooting team in the nation.  Period.  They are the 2nd worst in the nation in 3 point percentage (26.0%) and are the worst in the nation in two point percentage (37.2%).  There are 345 Division 1 basketball teams and they are 344th and 345th in 3 point and 2 point shooting respectively.

HOWEVER, they have not had a 3 point shooting slump anywhere near as bad as BYU’s current slump this season.  The worst 6 game total for Grambling was their first 6 games of the season, where they shot 21 of 95 (22.1%) from outside the arc.  Their worst is still 5% better than BYU’s worst.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

CougarStats 2000s all-decade team: Offensive Line


The voting for Wide Receivers last week wasn’t very close. Austin Collie ran away with it receiving 145 votes. Reno Mahe also made the team with 65 votes. Todd Watkins was the only other WR in the running with 47.

This week is different. We’re voting for the whole offensive line.  We have 13 nominees — three with the same last name. If you want to consider positions, great. Or, just vote for the best 5 and if we end up with five centers, we’ll let them take turns snapping the ball.

Your nominees are:  Ben Archibald Sete Aulai Travis Bright Ray Feinga Scott Jackson Jake Kuresa Dallas Reynolds Lance Reynolds Matt Reynolds Dustin Rykert Brian Sanders Jason Scukanec and Scott Young.

Remember, VOTE FOR FIVE LINEMEN.

Leave a comment

Filed under Football

The Terrible Tale of the Threes


Two weeks ago, BYU was better than more than 330 of the 345 Division 1 basketball teams in 3 point shooting. Over their first 20 games, BYU was making a very respectable 39.8% of their 3-point attempts. Then something happened. Something terrible. Something so unprobable that it led to the following use of oversized tables and graphs.

Over its last 4 games, BYU has only made 11 of 73 three point attempts, a mere 15.0%. Jimmer Fredette, over his last 4 games has made 11 of 17 NBA-length 3 point attempts; 56 fewer attempts than BYU, but the same number of makes.

Can this slump be blamed on the level of competition? Yes, and no. Loyola Marymount, Pepperdine, Virginia Tech and St. Mary’s rank 15th, 155th, 3rd and 246th respectively in 3 point percentage defense. That’s an average of 105th.

To try to get a rough feel for how unlikely the magnitude of this shooting slump is, let’s look at the math of the coin flip. In calculating the odds of getting a certain number of heads, an assumption is made that it doesn’t matter what has happened in the past as far as what will happen in the future. Now, intuition would have you believe that in the real world, it DOES matter how you have shot in the recent past when determining how likely you will make your next shot. In other words, if a team is hot, they will be more likely to make a shot than average and vice versa. However, statistical research into this very topic (feel free to Google a bit) has failed to substantiate that intuition.

So let’s assume that we have a coin that comes up heads 40% of the time; consistent with BYU’s 3 point accuracy for their first 20 games. If you flipped that lop-sided coin 73 times, how often would you expect to get heads 11 times or less? Well, I simulated this very thing 500,000 times in Excel. In only TWO simulations did Excel produce a result where there were 11 “heads” or less.

Take a look at the raw data and then the bar chart below.  I had to stretch the graph in Excel to be 350 rows high before I could even see the pixel representing BYU’s 11 for 73 likelihood.  Using this approximation, the odds against this severe of a slump is 250,000 to 1.  In reality the odds are most likely not anywhere that extreme, but even if you generously account for an increase in the level of competition and the psychological effects of being in a slump, it’s still safe to say that the magnitude of this slump is still quite remarkable.

Makes Frequency
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 1
10 0
11 1
12 7
13 15
14 52
15 122
16 329
17 660
18 1288
19 2533
20 4587
21 7715
22 11815
23 17362
24 23454
25 30451
26 37444
27 42789
28 46518
29 47320
30 45937
31 42273
32 36334
33 30068
34 23233
35 16976
36 11843
37 7892
38 4854
39 2910
40 1576
41 824
42 413
43 233
44 98
45 43
46 16
47 8
48 3
49 3
50 0
51 0
52 0
53 0
54 0
55 0
56 0
57 0
58 0
59 0
60 0
61 0
62 0
63 0
64 0
65 0
66 0
67 0
68 0
69 0
70 0
71 0
72 0
73 0

2 Comments

Filed under Basketball